Alexander Rodarte v. Merced County Sheriffs Department, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20261:25-cv-00487California1,798 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALEXANDER RODARTE, Case No.: 1:25-cv-00487-SKO Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO AMEND COMPLAINT AS MOOT

v. (Doc. 14) MERCED COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR Defendants. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 16 (Doc. 14) 17 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 18 Clerk of the Court to Assign District Judge

Plaintiff Alexander Rodarte, a former county jail inmate and current state prisoner, is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed his original complaint on April 18, 2025, in the Sacramento division of this Court. (Doc. 1.) The action was transferred to the Fresno division on April 28, 2025. (Doc. 4.) On October 30, 2025, Plaintiff filed a one-page document titled “Motion to Amend Complaint/Motion for Preliminary Injunction.” (Doc. 14.) On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.