Kimble

Jolee Kimble v. Frank Birchank

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20263:25-cv-03507California881 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Jolee KIMBLE, Case No.: 25-cv-3507-AGS-SBC Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

COMPEL SIGNATURE (ECF 9)

v. Frank BIRCHANK, Defendant. 8 Self-represented plaintiff Jolee Kimble seeks an ex parte order to grant her a “signature for CA State Bar acknowledging” a non-defendant’s “fraud to debar him” as well as “a DVRO [Domestic Violence Restraining Order] on” another non-defendant. (ECF 9, at 1.) In other words, it appears she seeks yet another temporary restraining order, after the Court denied her last one. (See ECF 6.) For many of the same reasons—including that her complaint has been dismissed—this new request is also denied. DISCUSSION A. Motion for Temporary Restraining Order A temporary restraining order is a form of emergency injunctive relief without notice to the other side. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65. Such emergency relief is “an extraordinary remedy never awarded as of right.” Winter v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.