Walker

Patrick Duane Walker v. United States of America, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20261:25-cv-01513California574 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PATRICK DUANE WALKER, Case No. 1:25-cv-01513-SKO

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

v. ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

RECOMMENDED FOR DISMISSAL

12 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., (Doc. 4) 13 Defendants. TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE _____________________________________/

15 Plaintiff Patrick Duane Walker is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. (Docs. 1, 3.) Plaintiff filed his complaint on November 7, 2025. On December 1, 2025, the Court issued an order finding that Plaintiff’s complaint failed to state any cognizable claims and granting leave for Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within thirty days or to notify the Court that he wishes to stand on his complaint. (Doc. 4.) The screening order was served on Plaintiff by mail on December 1, 2025. (See Docket.) To date, Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, notified the Court of his intention to stand on his complaint, or requested an extension of time within which to do so. The Local…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.