Robert Dean Neice v. Adult Probation Dept. PRCS Administrator & Staff

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20261:25-cv-01611California1,237 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT DEAN NEICE, Case No. 1:25-cv-01611-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE

v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

ADULT PROBATION DEPT. PRCS DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

ADMINISTRATOR & STAFF, FOR FAILURE TO OBEY COURT ORDER

AND FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE Defendant. (ECF No. 4) I. Background Plaintiff Robert Dean Neice (“Plaintiff”) is a county jail inmate proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on November 21, 2025, together with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) On November 25, 2025, the Court determined that Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis was incomplete because Plaintiff failed to submit a certified copy of his trust account statement and did not have an authorized officer from his institution of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.