Warden

Freddy Edilberto Cabanilla Arias v. Warden, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20265:25-cv-03228California414 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTE S – GENERAL

Case No. 5:25-cv-03228-AB-SK Date: January 6, 2026 Title Freddy Edilberto Cabanilla Arias v. Warden, et al.

Present: The Honorable: Steve Kim, United States Magistrate Judge

Connie Chung n/a Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Petitioner: Attorneys Present for Respondent:

None present None present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS MOOT

On December 2, 2025, Petitioner Freddy Edilberto Cabanilla Arias filed a habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging his detention and continued confinement at the Adelanto ICE Processing Center. (ECF 1). The court subsequently ordered Respondents to show cause why the petition should not be granted to the extent it sought an immediate individualized bond hearing. (ECF 8). In response, Respondents submitted written verification that Petitioner was released from custody on bond. (ECF 11-1 at 2). Respondents now contend that Petitioner’s release following an individualized bond hearing renders the petition moot.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.