Prem S. v. Warden of the Golden State Annex Detention Facility et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PREM S.,
Petitioner, No. 1:25-cv-01869-TLN-SCR
13 v. ORDER
WARDEN OF THE GOLDEN STATE
15 ANNEX DETENTION FACILITY et al., 16 Respondents.
17 On December 24, 2025, the Court granted Petitioner’s Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order1 (“TRO”) and ordered Respondents to show cause by January 5, 2026, why this Court should not issue a preliminary injunction on the same terms. (ECF No. 7.) Following the Court’s Order, Respondents filed notices of compliance confirming Petitioner was released at 8:03 p.m. on December 24, 2025. (ECF Nos. 8, 9.) On January 7, 2026 –– two days after the deadline imposed by the Court –– Respondents filed a notice of non-opposition. (ECF No. 14.) In light of Respondents non-opposition and because the standard for issuing a TRO is “substantially identical” to the standard for issuing a preliminary injunction, Stuhlbarg Int’l Sales 26 Petitioner originally filed a pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (ECF No.…