Candelaria Del Carmen Calderon v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 12, 202620-71345California670 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 12 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CANDELARIA DEL CARMEN No. 20-71345 CALDERON PALACIOS, AKA Candeleria del Carmen Calderon-Gutierrez; Agency Nos. A208-260-550

KATHERINNE NICOLLE CONTRERAS A208-260-551

CALDERON, AKA Katherinne Nicole Contreras Calderon,

MEMORANDUM*

Petitioners,

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 8, 2026** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: HAWKINS, RAWLINSON, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Candelaria Del Carmen Calderon Palacios and Katherinne Nicolle Contreras

Calderon (“Petitioners”), are a mother and daughter from El Salvador who seek

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.