Bondi
Sarceno Morales v. Bondi
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 12 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DINORA SARCENO MORALES, No. 25-53 Agency No. Petitioner, A075-262-323 v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 2, 2025** San Francisco, California
Before: RAWLINSON, MILLER, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.
Dinora Sarceno Morales, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision denying her motion
to reopen based on claims of ineffective assistance of counsel (IAC) and declining
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). to exercise its sua sponte reopening discretion. We have jurisdiction under
U.S.C. § 1252(b). We deny the petition.
1. We review the denial of a motion to…