Santiago-Patinio

Santiago-Patinio v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 12, 202625-433California628 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 12 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT SANTIAGO-PATINIO, No. 25-433 Agency No. Petitioner, A201-580-638 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 8, 2026** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: HAWKINS, RAWLINSON, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Robert Santiago-Patinio, a native and citizen of Ecuador, petitions for review

of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision dismissing his appeal of an

Immigration Judge’s (IJ) order denying his applications for asylum, withholding of

removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We review

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and CAT protection for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.