Piercy

Piercy v. Piercy CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 2026A172226California1,800 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 1/12/26 Piercy v. Piercy CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

TYLA PIERCY,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A172226

v. ERICK MICHAEL PIERCY, (San Mateo County Super. Ct. No. FAM0132753) Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Erick Piercy appeals the trial court’s order granting the request of plaintiff Tyla Piercy for modification of timeshare and child support orders. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In May 2016, Tyla petitioned for dissolution of her marriage to Erick.1 The parties were granted joint legal custody of their three children. In March 2019, the parties stipulated to Erick’s payment of guideline child support in the amount of $775 per month, which was based his allocated timeshare with the children of 45…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.