People v. Thurman CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 2026C103734California1,024 words

Opinion

Opinion

Eurie, J.

Filed 1/12/26 P. v. Thurman CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Siskiyou) ----

THE PEOPLE, C103734, C104031

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. Nos. 24CF12885, 24CF12919) v.

SHABAKA LAMUMBASEIKO THURMAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant Shabaka Lamubaseiko Thurman has asked this court to conduct an independent review of the record in case Nos. C103734 and C104031 to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) On our own motion, we consolidated the appeals for purposes of oral argument and decision. Having reviewed the record as required by Wende, we find the

1 trial court erred in calculating Thurman’s presentence custody…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.