Eduardo V.M. v. Warden of the Golden State Annex Detention Facility et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20261:26-cv-00017California839 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 EDUARDO V.M., No. 1:26-cv-00017-TLN-AC Petitioner, v. ORDER WARDEN OF THE GOLDEN STATE ANNEX DETENTION FACILITY et al., 14 Respondents.

16 Petitioner Eduardo V.M.1 (“Petitioner”), an immigration detainee who is representing 17 himself, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Based on the 18 substance of Petitioner’s brief and the relief requested therein, the Court construes Petitioner’s 19 pleading as a motion for a temporary restraining order. Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106 20 (1976) (stating that pleadings by pro se litigants must be held to less stringent standards than 21 formal pleadings drafted by lawyers). 22 Respondents shall file a response to Petitioner’s request for injunctive relief by noon on 23 24 As recommended by the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States, the Court omits petitioner’s full name, using only his first name and last initial, to protect…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.