Sara Hassanzadeh v. Warden of the California City Immigration Processing Center, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20261:26-cv-00056California477 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SARA HASSANZADEH, No. 1:26-cv-0056-DC-CKD P Petitioner, v. ORDER WARDEN OF THE CALIFORNIA CITY

IMMIGRATION PROCESSING

CENTER, et al., Respondents. 17 Petitioner, an Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainee who is currently representing herself, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court has conducted a preliminary review of the petition pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254. In light of the complexity of the legal issues involved, the court has determined the interests of justice require appointment of counsel. See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B); see also Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983). Because petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if the claimed violation of constitutional rights is proved, respondent will be served with the § 2241 petition. See 28 U.S.C.

Rule 1(b) of the Rules…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.