Luz Mejia-Ramirez v. Pamela Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 14, 202621-70564California982 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 14 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LUZ CLARITA MEJIA-RAMIREZ; J. E. No. 21-70564
A.-M.,
Agency Nos. A212-901-329 Petitioners, A212-901-330
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted January 12, 2026** San Francisco, California
Before: FRIEDLAND, MILLER, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.
Luz Mejia-Ramirez and her minor son,1 natives and citizens of Guatemala,
petition for review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)
affirming the denial by an immigration judge (“IJ”) of Mejia-Ramirez’s application
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 Mejia-Ramirez’s application listed her son as a derivative beneficiary. for asylum, withholding of removal, and…