Luz Mejia-Ramirez v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 14, 202621-70564California982 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 14 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LUZ CLARITA MEJIA-RAMIREZ; J. E. No. 21-70564

A.-M.,

Agency Nos. A212-901-329 Petitioners, A212-901-330

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 12, 2026** San Francisco, California

Before: FRIEDLAND, MILLER, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Luz Mejia-Ramirez and her minor son,1 natives and citizens of Guatemala,

petition for review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)

affirming the denial by an immigration judge (“IJ”) of Mejia-Ramirez’s application

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 Mejia-Ramirez’s application listed her son as a derivative beneficiary. for asylum, withholding of removal, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.