People v. Cicero CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 2026C101844California2,025 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mauro, J.

BACKGROUND

We derive the following facts from this court’s prior opinion on direct appeal (People v. Cicero (July 9, 2003, C039206) [nonpub. opn.]), but we do not rely on them to address defendant’s contentions. In July 2000, defendant and Maria Tenorio planned to rob a patron of an adult theater. Defendant ultimately stabbed and killed the victim, Peter Trujillo. A jury convicted defendant of first degree murder (§ 187, subd. (a)) and found true the special circumstance allegation that in committing the murder, defendant committed a robbery or attempted robbery (§ 190.2, subd. (a)(17)). However, the jury deadlocked on an allegation that defendant used a deadly weapon, a knife. (§ 12022, subd. (b)(1).) The trial court declared a mistrial on the allegation, which the court dismissed on the People’s motion. The trial court sentenced defendant to life without the possibility of parole. In July 2022, defendant filed a section 1172.6 petition, and the trial court appointed counsel for defendant. After the People conceded that defendant had made a prima facie showing, the trial court issued an order to show cause and received additional briefing. The prosecution submitted the record…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.