Andes

Shawn C. Brown v. Chance Andes

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20262:24-cv-00742California443 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAWN C. BROWN, No. 2:24-cv-00742-DC-CKD (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

CHANCE ANDES, (Doc. Nos. 25, 29) Respondents. 16 Petitioner Shawn C. Brown, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 14, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein, which were served on the parties and contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (Doc. No. 29.) The parties have not filed objections to the findings and recommendations, and the time to do so has passed. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.