Nelly Fiallos-Munoz v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 15, 202619-72336California951 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 15 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NELLY FIALLOS-MUNOZ, No. 19-72336 Agency No. Petitioner, 089-100-637 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 15, 2026**

Before: GOULD, BENNETT, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

Pro se Petitioner Nelly Fiallos-Munoz seeks review of a Board of

Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision affirming the denial of her applications for

asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against

Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). petition.

“We review factual findings, including adverse credibility determinations,

for substantial evidence,” and we…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.