United States v. Richardson

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 15, 202625-1555California973 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 15 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 25-1555 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:23-cr-00196-WHA-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

DWAYNE RICHARDSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William Alsup, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 9, 2026** San Francisco, California

Before: NGUYEN and BENNETT, Circuit Judges, and MATSUMOTO, District Judge.***

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Kiyo A. Matsumoto, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation. Dwayne Richardson appeals his conviction on three counts of 18 U.S.C.

§ 7201 tax fraud offenses. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we

affirm.

Richardson challenges his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.