Torres-Contreras

Torres-Contreras v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 15, 202623-3986California975 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 15 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

REINA MADELIN TORRES- No. 23-3986 CONTRERAS; et al., Agency Nos.

A220-600-210

Petitioners, A220-152-682 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 15, 2026**

Before: BENNETT, BADE, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

Reina Madelin Torres-Contreras and her minor daughter, natives and

citizens of El Salvador, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an Immigration Judge’s

decision denying their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).1 We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.