Torres-Contreras
Torres-Contreras v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 15, 202623-3986California975 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 15 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
REINA MADELIN TORRES- No. 23-3986 CONTRERAS; et al., Agency Nos.
A220-600-210
Petitioners, A220-152-682 v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted January 15, 2026**
Before: BENNETT, BADE, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.
Reina Madelin Torres-Contreras and her minor daughter, natives and
citizens of El Salvador, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration
Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an Immigration Judge’s
decision denying their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).1 We have…