Bledsoe
Bledsoe v. Martinez
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 15 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DONNELL BLEDSOE, No. 24-2198 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:18-cv-02710-DAD-KJN v.
MEMORANDUM*
MARTINEZ, Sgt.; LEATUGE; MICHELL;
CHRISTEN; SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
JAIL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 15, 2026**
Before: PAEZ, BENNETT, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiff-Appellant Donnell Bledsoe, proceeding pro se, appeals the district
court’s entry of judgment in favor of Defendant, Sergeant Martinez, following a
jury trial and verdict in favor of Martinez. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1291, and we affirm.