Bledsoe

Bledsoe v. Martinez

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 15, 202624-2198California575 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 15 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DONNELL BLEDSOE, No. 24-2198 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:18-cv-02710-DAD-KJN v.

MEMORANDUM*

MARTINEZ, Sgt.; LEATUGE; MICHELL;

CHRISTEN; SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

JAIL,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 15, 2026**

Before: PAEZ, BENNETT, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Donnell Bledsoe, proceeding pro se, appeals the district

court’s entry of judgment in favor of Defendant, Sergeant Martinez, following a

jury trial and verdict in favor of Martinez. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1291, and we affirm.

Bledsoe challenges two of the district court’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.