Baker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL E. JACQUES, Case No. 2:25-cv-0830-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER; FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

D. BAKER, et al.,

Defendants. 16 On September 15, 2025, defendants filed a motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, to revoke plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status. ECF No. 19. Plaintiff failed to timely file either an opposition or a statement of non-opposition. Therefore, on October 30, 2025, I ordered plaintiff, within twenty-one days, (1) to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to prosecute and (2) to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition within twenty-one days. ECF No. 20. I also warned plaintiff that his failure to respond would constitute a failure to comply with a court order and would result in dismissal of this case. Plaintiff has not responded, and the time to do so has passed. Accordingly, dismissal is warranted. The court has the inherent power to control its…