Mccormick

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHEILA MCCORMICK, et al., Case No. 2:25-cv-1468-JDP (PS) Plaintiffs, v. ORDER CITY OF VALLEJO, et al., Defendants, 16 Defendants have filed motions to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint, which are currently set for hearing on January 15, 2026. ECF Nos. 15 & 16; see ECF Nos. 30 & 31. On November 14, 2025, the court granted Benjamin Nisenbaum and Katherine MacElhiney’s motion to withdraw as plaintiffs’ attorneys. ECF No. 30. The court also ordered plaintiffs to either file a response to defendants’ motions to dismiss or notify the court that they wish stand by the oppositions filed by their former counsel. ECF No. 30; see ECF Nos. 20 & 21. Plaintiffs failed to respond to that order. Accordingly, on December 5, 2025, plaintiffs were ordered to show cause, by no later than December 19, 2025, why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to timely comply with the court’s November 14, 2025 order. ECF No. 31. The court also warned…