Schoene
Schoene v. Christensen
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 16 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KIMBERLY M. SCHOENE, No. 24-2317 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:23-cv-00693-AN v.
MEMORANDUM*
PENELOPE CHRISTENSEN, an Oregon resident; PORTLAND HAIR EXTENSIONS BY PENELOPE, an active Oregon corporation,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Adrienne C. Nelson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 16, 2026**
Before: PAEZ, BENNETT, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiff Kimberly M. Schoene appeals from the district court’s grant of
summary judgment dismissing her claims against Defendants, Penelope
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Christensen and Portland Hair Extensions by Penelope. We have jurisdiction
under 8 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.
“We review grants of summary judgment…