Henry

Henry v. Komarovsky

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 16, 202624-3014California1,875 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 16 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID G. HENRY, No. 24-3014 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:22-cv-05523-TMC v.

MEMORANDUM*

RON KOMAROVSKY, Police Officer; BRYNN CELLAN, Police Officer; CITY OF TACOMA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Tiffany M. Cartwright, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 16, 2026**

Before: PAEZ, BENNETT, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

David Henry appeals from the district court’s entry of summary judgment in

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations arising from his 2021

arrest. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, see Lowry

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). v. City of San Diego, 858 F.3d 1248, 1254 (9th Cir. 2017) (en…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.