Jones

Jones v. County of Tulare

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 16, 202624-4783California1,118 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 16 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MIKAL JONES and ANGELA No. 24-4783

ANDERSON,

D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellants, 1:17-cv-01260-SKO

v.

MEMORANDUM*

COUNTY OF TULARE, CALIFORNIA;

MICHAEL BOUDREAUX, in his capacity as Sheriff, County of Tulare, California; MICHAEL TORRES, Individually and in his capacity as Deputy Sheriff, County of Tulare, California,

Defendant-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Sheila K. Oberto, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 8, 2026** San Francisco, California

Before: NGUYEN and BENNETT, Circuit Judges, and MATSUMOTO,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Kiyo A. Matsumoto, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.