22:I[98912,["/_next/static/chunks/0asocxi83kb~5.js","/_next/static/chunks/0n4z.7yu76je-.js","/_next/static/chunks/0eyt_ou8dj52g.js","/_next/static/chunks/01bcia3bjqt9z.js","/_next/static/chunks/15egrlmmf_yst.js"],"CaseDetailGate"] 23:T443,DISCUSSION In his supplemental briefing filed with this court on September 24, 2025, defendant does not challenge his resentencing on the attempted murder count. And, indeed, he could not challenge it in light of his waiver of appellate rights. (E.g., People v. Cisneros-Ramirez (2018) 29 Cal.App.5th 393, 400.) Instead, defendant instead seeks to be resentenced on a wholly different conviction he claims to have suffered in Lassen County in 2021 for assault with a deadly weapon. The conviction defendant seeks to challenge in his supplemental brief is not properly before us because (1) it is outside the scope of the notice of appeal in this case (which deals solely with his attempted murder conviction), and (2) it was 3 suffered in Lassen County, which is outside our geographic jurisdiction to review. DISPOSITION The trial court’s order denying defendant’s section 1172.6 petition is affirmed. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS. ______________________, P. J. HOFFSTADT We concur: _________________________, J. MOOR _________________________, J. KIM (D.) 424:T48b,

DISCUSSION

In his supplemental briefing filed with this court on September 24, 2025, defendant does not challenge his resentencing on the attempted murder count. And, indeed, he could not challenge it in light of his waiver of appellate rights. (E.g., People v. Cisneros-Ramirez (2018) 29 Cal.App.5th 393, 400.) Instead, defendant instead seeks to be resentenced on a wholly different conviction he claims to have suffered in Lassen County in 2021 for assault with a deadly weapon. The conviction defendant seeks to challenge in his supplemental brief is not properly before us because (1) it is outside the scope of the notice of appeal in this case (which deals solely with his attempted murder conviction), and (2) it was

3 suffered in Lassen County, which is outside our geographic jurisdiction to review.

DISPOSITION

The trial court’s order denying defendant’s section 1172.6 petition is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS.

______________________, P. J.

HOFFSTADT

We concur:

_________________________, J.

MOOR

_________________________, J.

KIM (D.)