Fletcher Sherman Legardy v. Sunrise Mall Owner Group

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20262:25-cv-02513California284 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FLETCHER SHERMAN LEGARDY, No. 2:25-cv-2513 DJC AC PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER SUNRISE MALL OWNER GROUP, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff represented himself in this closed case, and accordingly the motion now before the court was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On January 5, 2026, plaintiff filed a Motion for an Extension of Time to Prepare Typed Letter to Court regarding his request that the court return his filing fee. ECF No. 10. Plaintiff’s case was closed on December 8, 2025. ECF No. 9. Plaintiff is advised that documents filed after the closing date will be disregarded and no orders will issue in response to future filings. Moreover, the court will not grant plaintiff an extension of time because the anticipated motion for a return of the filing fee is meritless. “Given that the filing fee covers the opening of a case, parties are not entitled to refunds of those filing fees when the case is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.