Michael Yamamoto v. Federal Express Corporation, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20262:25-cv-06796California2,783 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 25-6796 PA (SKx) Date January 8, 2026 Title Michael Yamamoto v. Federal Express Corporation, et al.

Present: The Honorable PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Kamilla Sali-Suleyman Not Reported N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendant: None None Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS — COURT ORDER Before the Court is a Motion to Remand filed by plaintiff Michael Yamamoto (“Plaintiff”) (Docket No. 24.) Plaintiff contends that the Notice of Removal filed by defendants Federal Express Corporation and FedEx Corporation (“Defendants’’) fails to satisfactorily establish that the parties are minimally diverse or that the amount in controversy exceeds the $5 million jurisdictional minimum for the Court’s subject matter jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d). The Motion to Remand 1s fully briefed. (Docket…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.