Calise

Christopher Calise, et al. v. Meta Platforms, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20264:21-cv-06186California1,334 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CHRISTOPHER CALISE, et al., Case No. 21-cv-06186-JSW

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. CERTIFY ORDER FOR

INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL

META PLATFORMS, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 71 Defendant.

15 Now before the Court is the motion to certify an order for interlocutory appeal filed by Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc. (“Meta”). The Court finds the motion suitable for decision without oral argument and HEREBY VACATES the hearing set for February 6, 2026. The Court has considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case and exercises its discretion to GRANT the motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1292(b). Meta’s motion seeks to certify this Court’s order denying Meta’s motion to dismiss (“Order”) for interlocutory appeal with respect to the following two questions: (1) whether the Terms of Service (“TOS”) and Community Standards “impose an affirmative obligation on Meta to combat purported scam advertisements,”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.