Ajaelo

Jideofer Ajaelo v. R. Estrada, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 20263:24-cv-02472California5,927 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 JIDEOFOR AJAELO, Case No.: 24-cv-02472-AJB-MMP

Plaintiff,

REPORT AND

v. RECOMMENDATION RE

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

R. ESTRADA, et al.,

DISMISS; AND

Defendants.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL

15 [ECF Nos. 10, 14] 16 17 This Report and Recommendation is submitted to United States District Judge Anthony J. Battaglia pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Civil Local Rules 72.1(c) and 72.3 of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. Pending before the Court is Defendants R. Estrada and Mario Alonzo’s Motion to Dismiss. ECF No. 10. Plaintiff filed an opposition, to which Defendants replied. ECF Nos. 12, 13. The Court found the motion suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). ECF No. 11. After briefing on Defendants’ motion was complete, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Appoint Counsel. ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.