Joseph Rose v. Artiano Shinoff APC, et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 JOSEPH ROSE, aCase No. 8:25-01401 CV (ADS)

Plaintiff, ORDER ACCEPTING UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

v. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

13 ARTIANO SHINOFF APC, et al., [DOC. # 66] 14 Defendants.

16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s Complaint 17 (Doc. #1), the First Amended Complaint (Doc. # 19), the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 18 # 20), Plaintiff’s Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 23), the Reply (Doc. # 26) the Report and Recommendation of United State Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 21 22 23 24 66, “R&R”), Plaintiff’s Objections to the R&R (Doc. ## 69, 71), and Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiff’s Objections to the R&R (Doc. # 76), and the record in the case.1 3 The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report 4 and Recommendation to which objections were made. To the extent the R&R 5 recommends the dismissal of Plaintiff’s state court claims with prejudice, the Court 6 sustains Plaintiff’s objection. For those state court…