Marko Mandaric, Kahlie Mandaric v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., dba Chase Auto Finance; Doe 1 Repossession Agency; Doe 2 Tow Operator; and Does 3-15

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20268:25-cv-02321California4,510 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 MARKO MANDARIC, KAHLIE ) Case No. 8:25-cv-02321-FWS-JDE

MANDARIC, )

12 ) Plaintiffs, ) STIPULATED PROTECTIVE 13 ORDER ) v. 14 ) JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., dba ) 15

CHASE AUTO FINANCE; DOE 1 )

16 REPOSSESSION AGENCY; DOE 2 ) TOW OPERATOR; and DOES 3-15, ) 17 ) Defendants. ) 18

19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Based on the Parties’ Stipulation (Dkt. 25) and for good cause shown, the 2 Court finds and orders as follows. 3 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 4 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 5 proprietary or private information for which special protection from public disclosure 6 and from use for any purpose other than pursuing this litigation may be warranted. 7 Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the 8 following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does 9 not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.