Marko Mandaric, Kahlie Mandaric v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., dba Chase Auto Finance; Doe 1 Repossession Agency; Doe 2 Tow Operator; and Does 3-15

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20268:25-cv-02321California4,510 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARKO MANDARIC, KAHLIE ) Case No. 8:25-cv-02321-FWS-JDE

MANDARIC, )

) Plaintiffs, ) STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER ) v. ) JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., dba )

CHASE AUTO FINANCE; DOE )

REPOSSESSION AGENCY; DOE ) TOW OPERATOR; and DOES 3-15, ) ) Defendants. )

19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Based on the Parties’ Stipulation (Dkt. 25) and for good cause shown, the Court finds and orders as follows. 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than pursuing this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.