Anthony
Marian Anthony v. Terrie E. Roberts, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARIAN ANTHONY, Case No.: 3:25-cv-2486-CAB-AHG
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
v. RECONSIDERATION
TERRIE E. ROBERTS, et al., [Doc. No. 27] Defendants. 16 On December 10, 2025, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). [Doc. No. 27.] Plaintiff seeks reconsideration of the Court’s December 1, 2025 order, which, inter alia, dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint with prejudice. [Doc. No. 25.] “A motion for reconsideration should not be granted, absent highly unusual circumstances, unless the district court is presented with newly discovered evidence, committed clear error, or if there is an intervening change in the controlling law.” Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co., 571 F.3d 873, 880 (9th Cir. 2009). Plaintiff argues reconsideration is warranted because he claims he has submitted the official transcript of a …