Koeller

Kate Koeller, et al. v. Nixplay, Inc., et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20265:25-cv-04549California6,409 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 KATE KOELLER, et al., Case No. 25-cv-04549-VKD

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. REMAND

NIXPLAY, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 21 Defendants.

13 On May 29, 2025, defendants Nixplay, Inc. and Creedon Technologies USA, LLC removed this action from the Superior Court for the County of Santa Clara, invoking the Court’s diversity jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1332. See Dkt. No. 1. On July 28, 2025, plaintiffs Kate Koeller, Jeff Koeller, Matt Davidson, and Amy Boleski filed a first amended complaint. Dkt. No. 16. On August 11, 2025, defendants filed an amended notice of removal. Dkt. No. 19. On August 18, 2025, plaintiffs moved to remand this action back to state court. Dkt. No. 21. Defendants opposed the motion. Dkt. No. 29. On September 23, 2025, the Court heard oral argument on the motion. Dkt. No. 38. Thereafter, as permitted by the Court, the parties engaged in limited…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.