Unknown

David William Wuco v. John Doe, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20261:23-cv-00572California1,592 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID WILLIAM WUCO, Case No.: 1:23-cv-00572-KES-SKO (PC) Plaintiff, RENEWED FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS

v. DEFENDANTS JANE DOE AND JOHN DOE

WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR PLAINTIFF’S

JOHN DOE, et al., FAILURE TO EFFECT SERVICE OF

PROCESS

Defendants. 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

18 Plaintiff David William Wuco is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 19 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment 20 excessive force claim against John Doe, and deliberate indifference to serious medical needs 21 claims against John Doe and Jane Doe. (See Doc. 21 [Order Adopting Findings and 22 Recommendations issued 6/12/2025].) 23 I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND On June 13, 2025, the Court issued its Order Granting Plaintiff Ninety Days Within Which to Identify Doe Defendants. (Doc. 22.) Plaintiff was directed to identify “John Doe and Jane Doe, through subpoena or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.