People v. Van CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 20, 2026E086566California671 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 1/20/26 P. v. Van CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, E086566

v. (Super.Ct.No. FCH01225)

TOAN QUOC VAN, OPINION

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Michael A. Knish,

Judge. Affirmed.

Toan Quoc Van, in pro. per.; and Charles Thomas Anderson, under appointment

by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Defendant and appellant Toan Quoc Van filed a postjudgment motion to strike his

conviction pursuant to Senate Bill No. 1393, which the court denied. (2022) 14 Cal.5th 216…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.