Lazaro Juarez Angeles v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 21, 202618-72901California744 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 21 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LAZARO JUAREZ ANGELES, No. 18-72901

Petitioner, Agency No. A099-418-343

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 21, 2026** San Francisco, California

Before: GOULD, BENNETT, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Lazaro Juarez Angeles, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upholding an

immigration judge’s (IJ’s) denial of his application for asylum, withholding of

removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and deny the petition.

In 2005, seeking a better life…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.