People v. Lozano CA3
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 1/21/26 P. v. Lozano CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Sacramento) ----
THE PEOPLE, C100691
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 05F00498)
v.
ANTHONY DAVID LOZANO,
Defendant and Appellant.
Defendant Anthony David Lozano1 was committed as a sexually violent predator under the Sexually Violent Predator Act (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6600 et seq.) (Act). He previously appealed that determination, arguing the trial court erred by (1) denying his motion under People v. Marsden (1970) 2 Cal.3d 118 (Marsden) and (2) denying his
Defendant’s name appears as both “Anthony David Lozano” and “Anthony David Lozano-Marks” throughout the record. We use defendant’s name as it appears on the order…