People v. Lozano CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 2026C100691California5,420 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 1/21/26 P. v. Lozano CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C100691

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 05F00498)

v.

ANTHONY DAVID LOZANO,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Anthony David Lozano1 was committed as a sexually violent predator under the Sexually Violent Predator Act (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6600 et seq.) (Act). He previously appealed that determination, arguing the trial court erred by (1) denying his motion under People v. Marsden (1970) 2 Cal.3d 118 (Marsden) and (2) denying his

Defendant’s name appears as both “Anthony David Lozano” and “Anthony David Lozano-Marks” throughout the record. We use defendant’s name as it appears on the order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.