People v. Briles CA4/3

Filed 1/22/26 P. v. Briles CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Appellant, G065030

v. (Super. Ct. No. 19NF2986)

THOMAS PAUL BRILES, OPINION

Defendant and Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Lewis W. Clapp, Judge. Affirmed. Todd Spitzer, Orange County District Attorney, and Austin Deuel, Deputy District Attorney, for Plaintiff and Appellant. Law Offices of John D. Barnett and John D. Barnett and Albert A. Newton, for Defendant and Respondent. Defendant Thomas Briles was charged with two counts of driving under the influence of a controlled substance causing bodily injury, with an…