Joseph Rose v. Holly Boyer, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 20262:25-cv-11653California629 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-

2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH ROSE, Case No. 2:25-cv-11653-CV (ADS) Plaintiff,

ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S

v. UNTIMELY OBJECTIONS TO

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION, HOLLY BOYER, et al., PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 15 Defendants. REASSIGNMENT, AND ORDER CLOSING CASE 17 [DOC. ## 12, 13, 15] 18 19 20 On December 10, 2025, the magistrate judge assigned to this case issued a 21 Report and Recommendation on Plaintiff’s Request for Proceed In Forma Pauperis. 22 Doc. # 5, “R&R”). The R&R found that that Plaintiff Joseph Rose’s (“Plaintiff”) In 23 Forma Pauperis request was incomplete and insufficient to determine whether he was 24 able to prepay the full filing fee. The R&R also noted that the court lacks jurisdiction 25 over Plaintiff’s claims, that Plaintiff had failed to state a claim, and that granting leave 26 to amend would be futile. Id. 27 28 After the issuance of the R&R, Plaintiff filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.