Jose Luis Estrada Sanchez v. Warden of the Golden State Annex Detention Facility, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSE LUIS ESTRADA SANCHEZ, No. 1:25-cv-01964-KES-SKO (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
PETITION SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED
13 v. [30- DAY DEADLINE] 14 WARDEN OF THE GOLDEN STATE ANNEX DETENTION FACILITY, et al., 15 Respondents. 16
17 Petitioner has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging his indefinite detention 18 by the United States Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”). 19 Petitioner states he has been continuously detained by ICE since approximately May of 20 2025. He contends that his detention pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(2) has exceeded the six- 21 month presumptive period set forth in Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001), that his continued 22 detention is no longer reasonable, that Respondent has been unable to effect his removal, that 23 there is no “significant likelihood” of such removal in the “reasonably foreseeable future,” and 24 therefore that his ongoing detention is indefinite and violates his substantive and procedural due 25 process rights under the…