Truman
Kellis Lloyd Truman v. Edward Borla, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KELLIS LLOYD TRUMAN, Case No. 25-cv-06375-TLT
Plaintiff,
ORDER VACATING JUDGMENT,
v. REOPENING CASE, OF SERVICE
EDWARD BORLA, et al., Defendants.
12 In light of plaintiff’s compliance with the Northern District of California’s General Order No. 76 (GO 76) on December 15, 2025, this case is hereby reopened. The prior judgment (Dkt. No. 20) is vacated. Plaintiff, a prisoner at Correctional Training Facility (CTF), filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The complaint is before the Court for screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. For the reasons stated below, the complaint is ordered served on defendants Borla and Macomber. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In…