United States v. Garcia Rodriguez

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 23, 202624-1939California1,152 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 23 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-1939 D.C. Nos. Plaintiff - Appellee, 4:19-cr-00614-PJH-1 4:22-cv-06506-PJH v. Northern District of California, Oakland

JOSE DE JESUS GARCIA RODRIGUEZ,

MEMORANDUM*

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Phyllis Hamilton, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted January 8, 2026 San Francisco, California

Before: NGUYEN and BENNETT, Circuit Judges, and MATSUMOTO, Senior District Judge. **

On October 24, 2022, Garcia Rodriguez moved to vacate his conviction under

28 U.S.C. § 2255, claiming ineffective assistance of counsel (“IAC”) based on trial

counsel’s alleged failure to advise Garcia Rodriguez of the “virtually certain”

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Kiyo A. Matsumoto, United States Senior District Judge for the Eastern District of New…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.