Sweidy

Sweidy v. Spring Ridge Academy

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 23, 202624-4318California2,909 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 23 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KIMBERLY R. SWEIDY, No. 24-4318 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:21-cv-08013-SPL v.

MEMORANDUM*

SPRING RIDGE ACADEMY, an Arizona corporation; JEAN COURTNEY;

SUZANNE COURTNEY; BRANDON

COURTNEY; ERIN SMITH; LESLIE

FILSINGER; JUSTIN ZYCH; KATE

DEILY; and VERONICA BORGES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Steven Paul Logan, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted January 5, 2026 Phoenix, Arizona

Before: HAWKINS, RAWLINSON, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges. Concurrence by Judge RAWLINSON.

Plaintiff-Appellant Kimberly R. Sweidy (Sweidy) brought this suit against

Spring Ridge Academy (SRA) and eight of its individual employees (collectively,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Defendants) for claims related to her daughter, René Rearden Sweidy Stata

(Rearden), and Rearden’s enrollment at SRA. Sweidy…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.