Florer

Florer v. Ford Motor Company

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 23, 202624-2591California621 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 23 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DENNIS SCOTT FLORER, No. 24-2591 D.C. No. 1:22-cv-00449-BLW-DKG Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

FORD MOTOR COMPANY; LITHIA

FORD OF BOISE; RHETT SHEEDER;

RICH STUART; ANGELO SANCHEZ;

TRAVIS STEAR,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho B. Lynn Winmill, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 22, 2026**

Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Dennis Scott Florer appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action alleging violations of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). awarding attorney’s fees and costs to Ford Motor Company. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.