Florer
Florer v. Ford Motor Company
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 23, 202624-2591California621 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 23 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DENNIS SCOTT FLORER, No. 24-2591 D.C. No. 1:22-cv-00449-BLW-DKG Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. MEMORANDUM*
FORD MOTOR COMPANY; LITHIA
FORD OF BOISE; RHETT SHEEDER;
RICH STUART; ANGELO SANCHEZ;
TRAVIS STEAR,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho B. Lynn Winmill, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 22, 2026**
Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
Dennis Scott Florer appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his action alleging violations of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). awarding attorney’s fees and costs to Ford Motor Company. We have jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. §…