Marriage of Kilpatrick and Hunt CA1/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 2026A171885California3,454 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 1/23/26 Marriage of Kilpatrick and Hunt CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

In re the Marriage of LUKE KILPATRICK and SARAH HUNT.

LUKE KILPATRICK,

Appellant, A171885 v. SARAH HUNT, (San Mateo County Respondent. Super. Ct. No. 20-FAM-00069)

This is an appeal from a trial court order, in family law proceedings, denying a request for a judicial determination that a 2023 stipulation and order (hereinafter, 2023 Stipulated Order) is void as a matter of law.1 Appellant, Luke Kilpatrick (father), contends the trial court acted ultra vires by delegating certain powers to a “private ‘mediator’ ” pursuant to the 2023…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.