Steeves

Steeves v. United States

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 23, 202624-7086California459 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 23 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DEAN ALLEN STEEVES, No. 24-7086 D.C. No. 3:24-cv-01300-DMS-AHG Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Dana M. Sabraw, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 22, 2026**

Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Dean Allen Steeves appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

denying his motion to quash a summons from the Internal Revenue Service and

granting the IRS’s motion to enforce the same summons. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for lack of subject matter

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). jurisdiction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.