Romero
Isabel Romero v. Capital One National Association, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 ISABEL ROMERO, Case No. 25-cv-08842-TSH Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: CONSENT TO
v. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
JURISDICTION
CAPITAL ONE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 18 Defendants. 9 On November 3, 2025, Plaintiff Isabel Romero filed a consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. ECF No.11. However, on January 9, 2026, Plaintiff filed a declination to proceed 12 || before a magistrate judge and request for reassignment to a district judge. ECF No. 18.
28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) requires the consent of all parties for “jurisdiction to vest in the
v || magistrate judge.” Williams v. King, 875 F.3d 500, 503-04 (9th Cir. 2017). “There is no absolute O || right, in a civil case, to withdraw consent to trial and other proceedings before a magistrate judge.” A Dixon vy. Yist, 990 F.2d 478, 480 (9th Cir. 2003) (citations omitted). After consenting to the
|| jurisdiction of a magistrate judge,…