Adrian Florentino Mendez Agama v. Warden of the Golden State Annex Detention Facility, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20261:26-cv-00022California443 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ADRIAN FLORENTINO MENDEZ No. 1:26-cv-0022-DAD-CKD P

AGAMA,

12 Petitioner, 13 ORDER v. 14

WARDEN OF THE GOLDEN STATE

15 ANNEX DETENTION FACILITY, et al., 16 Respondents. 17 18 Petitioner, an Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainee who is currently 19 representing himself, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, a 20 request to proceed in forma pauperis and a motion for appointment of counsel. 21 The application to proceed in forma pauperis makes the required showing and will be 22 granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 23 In light of the complexity of the legal issues involved, the court has determined the 24 interests of justice require appointment of counsel. See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B); see also 25 Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983). Therefore, the motion for appointment of 26 counsel will be granted. 27 Because petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if the claimed violation of 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.