Hendrix

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 ADAM HENDRIX, Case No. 25-cv-09674-CRB

Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

v.

RECOMMENDATION; DENYING

MOTION FOR RECUSAL;

LEONARDO GARCIA, et al., DISMISSING CASE Defendants.

Plaintiff Adam Hendrix, proceeding pro se, brought an action against a host of different defendants. Compl. (dkt. 1). After filing the instant action, Hendrix filed an emergency motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”). Mot. (dkt. 2). Given the lack of factual detail in Hendix’s motion and pleadings, the Court denied the motion. Order (dkt. 11). Magistrate Judge Lisa Cisneros screened the complaint and recommended dismissal with leave to amend. R&R (dkt. 7). Hendix filed a timely objection that included a motion for recusal. Obj. (dkt. 13). The Court determines that Judge Cisneros’ recommendation was well-reasoned and correct. Accordingly, the Court adopts the report and recommendation in full, denies the motion for recusal, and…